FAB vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FAB delivered stronger 1-year returns. FAB offers more diversification with 664 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: FABMore Diversified: FAB

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFABQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.66%0.18%
AUM$168M$455.8B
Dividend Yield1.59%0.41%
Holdings676108
YTD Return+18.92%+16.83%
1Y Return+31.03%+26.58%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.17%+24.70%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.17%+14.88%
Volatility (annualized)20.6%30.6%
Max Drawdown-64.3%-83.0%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 8, 2007Mar 10, 1999

FAB vs QQQ Performance

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FAB returned +31.03% while QQQ returned +26.58%. Year to date, FAB is up 18.92% versus a gain of 16.83% for QQQ.

Over three years, FAB compounded at +14.17% per year against +24.70% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.17% and +14.88% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.6% for FAB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.3% for FAB and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FAB charges 0.66% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $18 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FAB currently yields 1.59% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

3.5%overlap

FAB and QQQ share 18 holdings out of 749 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FABWeight in QQQDifference
TMUS0.37%0.90%0.53%
LIN:IE0.08%1.07%0.99%
PEP0.09%0.84%0.75%
CMCSAProProPro
PYPLProProPro
REGNProProPro
FANGProProPro
AEPProProPro
EXCProProPro
ROPProProPro
See all 10 holdings FAB shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FAB or QQQ?

FAB has an expense ratio of 0.66% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FAB or QQQ?

Over the past year FAB returned +31.03% vs +26.58% for QQQ, so FAB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FAB annualized +7.33% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FAB or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.6% for FAB. Worst drawdown: FAB -64.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both FAB and QQQ?

FAB and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FAB and QQQ?

FAB and QQQ share 18 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 749 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FAB or QQQ?

FAB yields 1.59% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so FAB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →