EIPX vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. EIPX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: EIPXMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEIPXIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%
AUM$560M$865.2B
Dividend Yield2.72%1.09%
Holdings92508
YTD Return+21.58%+13.80%
1Y Return+28.64%+23.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.09%+21.49%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.43%
Volatility (annualized)13.1%15.1%
Max Drawdown-15.4%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 2, 2022May 15, 2000

EIPX vs IVV Performance

FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EIPX returned +28.64% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, EIPX is up 21.58% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.

Over three years, EIPX compounded at +19.09% per year against +21.49% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, EIPX has the edge at +17.30% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.1% for EIPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for EIPX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EIPX charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIPX currently yields 2.72% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

4.4%overlap

EIPX and IVV share 41 holdings out of 552 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EIPXWeight in IVVDifference
XOM2.82%0.97%1.85%
KMI2.63%0.10%2.53%
OKE2.58%0.09%2.49%
SOProProPro
SREProProPro
PSXProProPro
BKRProProPro
DUKProProPro
EVRGProProPro
VSTProProPro
See all 10 holdings EIPX shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EIPX or IVV?

EIPX has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, EIPX or IVV?

Over the past year EIPX returned +28.64% vs +23.70% for IVV, so EIPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EIPX annualized +17.30% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, EIPX or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.1% for EIPX. Worst drawdown: EIPX -15.4% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both EIPX and IVV?

EIPX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between EIPX and IVV?

EIPX and IVV share 41 common holdings with a 4.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 552 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, EIPX or IVV?

EIPX yields 2.72% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EIPX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →