EHI vs IVV
EHI vs IVV
Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EHI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $193M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.92% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 398 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -2.18% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.44% | +19.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.07% | +19.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.10% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2003 | May 15, 2000 |
EHI vs IVV Performance
Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc (EHI) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EHI returned +0.44% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, EHI is down 2.18% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.
Over three years, EHI compounded at +5.07% per year against +19.41% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.10% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.91% annualized vs -1.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EHI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.1% for EHI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EHI charges 1.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $189 vs $3 annually, a gap of $186 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EHI currently yields 12.92% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EHI and IVV share 0 holdings out of 764 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EHI or IVV?
EHI has an expense ratio of 1.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $186 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EHI or IVV?
Over the past year EHI returned +0.44% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), EHI annualized -1.38% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EHI or IVV?
EHI has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EHI -66.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EHI and IVV?
EHI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EHI and IVV?
EHI and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 764 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EHI or IVV?
EHI yields 12.92% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.