EDGH vs QQQ
EDGH vs QQQ
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDGH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $128M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +10.01% | +17.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.95% | +28.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | 3 EDGE Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EDGH vs QQQ Performance
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) is a ETF from 3 EDGE Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EDGH returned +27.95% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, EDGH is up 10.01% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.2% for EDGH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.5% for EDGH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDGH charges 1.01% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $18 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDGH currently yields 1.12% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EDGH and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 111 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDGH or QQQ?
EDGH has an expense ratio of 1.01% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDGH or QQQ?
Over the past year EDGH returned +27.95% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EDGH annualized +17.75% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDGH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.2% for EDGH. Worst drawdown: EDGH -12.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EDGH and QQQ?
EDGH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDGH and QQQ?
EDGH and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 111 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDGH or QQQ?
EDGH yields 1.12% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so EDGH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.