DWUS vs IVV
DWUS vs IVV
Advisorshares Dorsey Wright Fsm Us Core Etf vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DWUS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $115M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.04% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.22% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.77% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.98% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
DWUS vs IVV Performance
Advisorshares Dorsey Wright Fsm Us Core Etf (DWUS) is a ETF from Advisor Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DWUS returned +17.22% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, DWUS is up 11.04% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, DWUS compounded at +17.77% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.98% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, DWUS has the edge at +14.48% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DWUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.5% for DWUS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DWUS charges 1.08% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $108 vs $3 annually, a gap of $105 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DWUS currently yields 0.03% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DWUS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DWUS or IVV?
DWUS has an expense ratio of 1.08% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $105 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DWUS or IVV?
Over the past year DWUS returned +17.22% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), DWUS annualized +14.48% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DWUS or IVV?
DWUS has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DWUS -30.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DWUS and IVV?
DWUS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between DWUS and IVV?
DWUS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DWUS or IVV?
DWUS yields 0.03% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.