DGRO vs NOBL

Quick Verdict

DGRO has a lower expense ratio. DGRO delivered stronger 1-year returns. DGRO offers more diversification with 380 holdings.

Lower Fees: DGROHigher Returns: DGROMore Diversified: DGRO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDGRONOBLWinner
Expense Ratio0.08%0.35%
AUM$42.8B$11.8B
Dividend Yield1.95%2.07%
Holdings39770
YTD Return+14.89%+12.40%
1Y Return+25.17%+15.29%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.52%+9.09%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.34%+6.83%
Volatility (annualized)13.7%14.1%
Max Drawdown-35.1%-35.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ProShares
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 10, 2014Oct 9, 2013

DGRO vs NOBL Performance

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year DGRO returned +25.17% while NOBL returned +15.29%. Year to date, DGRO is up 14.89% versus a gain of 12.40% for NOBL.

Over three years, DGRO compounded at +17.52% per year against +9.09% for NOBL; over five years the annualized figures are +11.34% and +6.83% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, DGRO has the edge at +11.23% annualized vs +9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NOBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.7% for DGRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for DGRO and -35.4% for NOBL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DGRO charges 0.08% per year while NOBL charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $35 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGRO currently yields 1.95% against 2.07% for NOBL.

Holdings Overlap

23.9%overlap

DGRO and NOBL share 49 holdings out of 400 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DGROWeight in NOBLDifference
ABBV3.03%1.70%1.33%
JNJ3.13%1.57%1.56%
XOM2.55%1.26%1.29%
PGProProPro
KOProProPro
IBMProProPro
PEPProProPro
NEEProProPro
MCDProProPro
ABTProProPro
See all 10 holdings DGRO shares with NOBL
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DGRO or NOBL?

DGRO has an expense ratio of 0.08% while NOBL charges 0.35%. DGRO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.

Which performed better, DGRO or NOBL?

Over the past year DGRO returned +25.17% vs +15.29% for NOBL, so DGRO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), DGRO annualized +11.23% vs +9.48% for NOBL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, DGRO or NOBL?

NOBL has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.7% for DGRO. Worst drawdown: DGRO -35.1% vs NOBL -35.4%.

Should I hold both DGRO and NOBL?

DGRO and NOBL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between DGRO and NOBL?

DGRO and NOBL share 49 common holdings with a 23.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 400 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, DGRO or NOBL?

DGRO yields 1.95% while NOBL yields 2.07%, so NOBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →