DBEF vs IVV
DBEF vs IVV
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DBEF delivered stronger 1-year returns. DBEF offers more diversification with 675 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBEF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9.2B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 707 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.38% | +11.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.94% | +21.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.29% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63% | +13.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
DBEF vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DBEF returned +27.94% while IVV returned +21.48%. Year to date, DBEF is up 13.38% versus a gain of 11.54% for IVV.
Over three years, DBEF compounded at +19.29% per year against +20.86% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.63% and +13.02% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, DBEF has the edge at +10.38% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.5% for DBEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.5% for DBEF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBEF charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBEF currently yields 2.31% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DBEF and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1180 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBEF or IVV?
DBEF has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBEF or IVV?
Over the past year DBEF returned +27.94% vs +21.48% for IVV, so DBEF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DBEF annualized +10.38% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBEF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.5% for DBEF. Worst drawdown: DBEF -32.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DBEF and IVV?
DBEF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBEF and IVV?
DBEF and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1180 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBEF or IVV?
DBEF yields 2.31% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DBEF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.