CPLB vs IVV
CPLB vs IVV
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPLB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $376M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.96% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 796 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.03% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.25% | +24.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.58% | +21.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.43% | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
CPLB vs IVV Performance
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CPLB returned +3.25% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, CPLB is up 1.03% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.
Over three years, CPLB compounded at +5.58% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.43% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.6% for CPLB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.0% for CPLB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPLB charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPLB currently yields 5.96% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CPLB and IVV share 0 holdings out of 924 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPLB or IVV?
CPLB has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CPLB or IVV?
Over the past year CPLB returned +3.25% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CPLB annualized +0.70% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CPLB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.6% for CPLB. Worst drawdown: CPLB -19.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CPLB and IVV?
CPLB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CPLB and IVV?
CPLB and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 924 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPLB or IVV?
CPLB yields 5.96% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CPLB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.