CGVV vs VXUS
CGVV vs VXUS
Capital Group US Large Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CGVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGVV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $137M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 66 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.97% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.36% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CGVV vs VXUS Performance
Capital Group US Large Value ETF (CGVV) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGVV returned +30.36% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, CGVV is up 18.97% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.9% for CGVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for CGVV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGVV charges 0.33% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $5 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGVV currently yields 0.85% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CGVV and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7925 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGVV or VXUS?
CGVV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGVV or VXUS?
Over the past year CGVV returned +30.36% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so CGVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGVV annualized +24.99% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGVV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.9% for CGVV. Worst drawdown: CGVV -10.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CGVV and VXUS?
CGVV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGVV and VXUS?
CGVV and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7925 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGVV or VXUS?
CGVV yields 0.85% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.