CGMS vs VXUS
CGMS vs VXUS
Capital Group US Multi Sector Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGMS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $5.3B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.12% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 1,447 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.33% | +11.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.05% | +26.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +18.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.1% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CGMS vs VXUS Performance
Capital Group US Multi Sector Income ETF (CGMS) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGMS returned +4.05% while VXUS returned +26.65%. Year to date, CGMS is up 1.33% versus a gain of 11.69% for VXUS.
Over three years, CGMS compounded at +7.55% per year against +18.15% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, CGMS has the edge at +8.02% annualized vs +4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 5.1% for CGMS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.1% for CGMS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGMS charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGMS currently yields 6.12% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CGMS and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 8690 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGMS | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIN:AU | 0.08% | 0.02% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGMS or VXUS?
CGMS has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGMS or VXUS?
Over the past year CGMS returned +4.05% vs +26.65% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGMS annualized +8.02% vs +4.69% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGMS or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 5.1% for CGMS. Worst drawdown: CGMS -4.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CGMS and VXUS?
CGMS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGMS and VXUS?
CGMS and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8690 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGMS or VXUS?
CGMS yields 6.12% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so CGMS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.