CARY vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCARYIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%
AUM$1.4B$865.2B
Dividend Yield6.28%1.09%
Holdings1,330508
YTD Return+1.60%+9.93%
1Y Return+4.94%+19.59%
3Y Return (annualized)+7.01%+19.41%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.89%
Volatility (annualized)2.8%15.1%
Max Drawdown-1.7%-56.5%
Fund FamilyAngel Oak Capital AdvisorsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionNov 7, 2022May 15, 2000

CARY vs IVV Performance

Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) is a ETF from Angel Oak Capital Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CARY returned +4.94% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, CARY is up 1.60% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.

Over three years, CARY compounded at +7.01% per year against +19.41% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, CARY has the edge at +6.99% annualized vs +6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.8% for CARY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.7% for CARY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CARY charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CARY currently yields 6.28% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

CARY and IVV share 0 holdings out of 768 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CARY or IVV?

CARY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CARY or IVV?

Over the past year CARY returned +4.94% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CARY annualized +6.99% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CARY or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.8% for CARY. Worst drawdown: CARY -1.7% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both CARY and IVV?

CARY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CARY and IVV?

CARY and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 768 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CARY or IVV?

CARY yields 6.28% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CARY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →