BRTR vs IVV
BRTR vs IVV
iShares Total Return Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. BRTR offers more diversification with 1114 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRTR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $735M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.72% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2,915 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.20% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.47% | +23.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BRTR vs IVV Performance
iShares Total Return Active ETF (BRTR) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BRTR returned +2.47% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, BRTR is down 0.20% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.9% for BRTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.7% for BRTR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRTR charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRTR currently yields 4.72% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BRTR and IVV share 17 holdings out of 1602 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BRTR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 0.03% | 4.57% | 4.54% |
| JPM | 0.05% | 1.43% | 1.38% |
| LLY | 0.03% | 1.44% | 1.41% |
| ABBV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| WFC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GEV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| C | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| DIS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TMUS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| XTSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings BRTR shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRTR or IVV?
BRTR has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BRTR or IVV?
Over the past year BRTR returned +2.47% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BRTR annualized +4.76% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BRTR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.9% for BRTR. Worst drawdown: BRTR -4.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BRTR and IVV?
BRTR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BRTR and IVV?
BRTR and IVV share 17 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1602 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRTR or IVV?
BRTR yields 4.72% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BRTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.