BKT vs VOO
BKT vs VOO
BlackRock Income Trust Inc vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $350M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.60% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 336 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -1.18% | +11.51% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.40% | +21.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.00% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.39% | +13.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 1988 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BKT vs VOO Performance
BlackRock Income Trust Inc (BKT) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKT returned -3.40% while VOO returned +21.46%. Year to date, BKT is down 1.18% versus a gain of 11.51% for VOO.
Over three years, BKT compounded at +4.00% per year against +20.86% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -3.39% and +13.01% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.44% annualized vs -0.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.2% for BKT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for BKT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKT charges 2.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $275 vs $3 annually, a gap of $272 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKT currently yields 9.60% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BKT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 599 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKT or VOO?
BKT has an expense ratio of 2.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $272 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKT or VOO?
Over the past year BKT returned -3.40% vs +21.46% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BKT annualized -0.40% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.2% for BKT. Worst drawdown: BKT -46.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BKT and VOO?
BKT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKT and VOO?
BKT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 599 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKT or VOO?
BKT yields 9.60% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BKT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.