BGRO vs IVV
BGRO vs IVV
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGRO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.15% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.55% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
BGRO vs IVV Performance
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF (BGRO) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BGRO returned +17.55% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, BGRO is up 14.15% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for BGRO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGRO charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGRO currently yields 0.03% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BGRO and IVV share 29 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGRO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 13.16% | 7.76% | 5.40% |
| AAPL | 6.89% | 7.44% | 0.55% |
| AMZN | 7.64% | 3.75% | 3.89% |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PANW | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| DDOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings BGRO shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGRO or IVV?
BGRO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGRO or IVV?
Over the past year BGRO returned +17.55% vs +23.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGRO annualized +17.73% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGRO or IVV?
BGRO has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BGRO -24.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BGRO and IVV?
BGRO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BGRO and IVV?
BGRO and IVV share 29 common holdings with a 38.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGRO or IVV?
BGRO yields 0.03% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.