AVMA vs IVV
AVMA vs IVV
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVMA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.21% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $81M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 19 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.78% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.17% | +24.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.99% | +21.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 27, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
AVMA vs IVV Performance
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AVMA returned +21.17% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, AVMA is up 11.78% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.
Over three years, AVMA compounded at +14.99% per year against +21.16% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, AVMA has the edge at +15.46% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.4% for AVMA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for AVMA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVMA charges 0.21% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $3 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVMA currently yields 2.02% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AVMA and IVV share 0 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVMA or IVV?
AVMA has an expense ratio of 0.21% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVMA or IVV?
Over the past year AVMA returned +21.17% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), AVMA annualized +15.46% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVMA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.4% for AVMA. Worst drawdown: AVMA -11.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AVMA and IVV?
AVMA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVMA and IVV?
AVMA and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVMA or IVV?
AVMA yields 2.02% while IVV yields 1.09%, so AVMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.