ASG vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricASGVYMWinner
Expense Ratio1.12%0.04%
AUM$373M$79.0B
Dividend Yield7.53%2.86%
Holdings125568
YTD Return+4.00%+13.24%
1Y Return+1.90%+23.76%
3Y Return (annualized)+6.86%+16.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-1.06%+12.26%
Volatility (annualized)22.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-86.2%-58.8%
Fund FamilyLiberty All Star FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMar 14, 1986Nov 10, 2006

ASG vs VYM Performance

Liberty All-Star Growth Fund Inc. (ASG) is a ETF from Liberty All Star Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASG returned +1.90% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, ASG is up 4.00% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.

Over three years, ASG compounded at +6.86% per year against +16.97% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -1.06% and +12.26% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.96% annualized vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.2% for ASG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ASG charges 1.12% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $112 vs $4 annually, a gap of $108 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASG currently yields 7.53% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

3.1%overlap

ASG and VYM share 12 holdings out of 670 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ASGWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO1.26%6.47%5.21%
CAT0.16%1.51%1.35%
TPR1.35%0.14%1.21%
MSProProPro
FASTProProPro
QProProPro
LOWProProPro
STEPProProPro
HLIProProPro
FITBProProPro
See all 10 holdings ASG shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ASG or VYM?

ASG has an expense ratio of 1.12% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $108 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ASG or VYM?

Over the past year ASG returned +1.90% vs +23.76% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ASG annualized -0.32% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ASG or VYM?

ASG has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ASG -86.2% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both ASG and VYM?

ASG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ASG and VYM?

ASG and VYM share 12 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 670 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ASG or VYM?

ASG yields 7.53% while VYM yields 2.86%, so ASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →