ACLC vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: QQQ

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACLCQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.18%
AUM$305M$455.8B
Dividend Yield0.54%0.41%
Holdings100108
YTD Return+11.91%+18.20%
1Y Return+20.09%+27.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.02%+25.54%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.50%+15.12%
Volatility (annualized)16.1%30.6%
Max Drawdown-26.4%-83.0%
Fund FamilyAmerican Century InvestmentsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 15, 2020Mar 10, 1999

ACLC vs QQQ Performance

American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ACLC returned +20.09% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, ACLC is up 11.91% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.

Over three years, ACLC compounded at +17.02% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.50% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ACLC has the edge at +14.55% annualized vs +13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.1% for ACLC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.4% for ACLC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACLC charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACLC currently yields 0.54% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

46.9%overlap

ACLC and QQQ share 35 holdings out of 168 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACLCWeight in QQQDifference
NVDA8.10%7.88%0.22%
AAPL4.75%7.46%2.71%
MSFT5.54%4.65%0.89%
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
MUProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
AMDProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ACLC shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACLC or QQQ?

ACLC has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ACLC or QQQ?

Over the past year ACLC returned +20.09% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACLC annualized +14.55% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ACLC or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.1% for ACLC. Worst drawdown: ACLC -26.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both ACLC and QQQ?

ACLC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ACLC and QQQ?

ACLC and QQQ share 35 common holdings with a 46.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 168 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACLC or QQQ?

ACLC yields 0.54% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so ACLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →