ABCS vs IVV
ABCS vs IVV
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ABCS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABCS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.11% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.14% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Alpha Blue Capital | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
ABCS vs IVV Performance
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is a ETF from Alpha Blue Capital and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABCS returned +27.14% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, ABCS is up 18.11% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for ABCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for ABCS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABCS charges 0.42% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABCS currently yields 1.18% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ABCS and IVV share 47 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABCS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANTM | 2.18% | 0.13% | 2.05% |
| GPN | 1.74% | 0.03% | 1.71% |
| AMP | 1.56% | 0.07% | 1.49% |
| USB | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| HPE | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| DAL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GEHC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CVS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| ACGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CNC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings ABCS shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABCS or IVV?
ABCS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABCS or IVV?
Over the past year ABCS returned +27.14% vs +23.70% for IVV, so ABCS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ABCS annualized +16.71% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABCS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for ABCS. Worst drawdown: ABCS -20.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ABCS and IVV?
ABCS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABCS and IVV?
ABCS and IVV share 47 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABCS or IVV?
ABCS yields 1.18% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ABCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.